Find here all the S.I.F. conference reports
Island Resilience conference report 2011
Mull Conference report 2007
Islay conference report, 2006
“Islands work” was the overall message at the European Small Islands conference held in Islay on Tuesday and Wednesday 21 and 22 November 2006.
The conference brought to Islay 150 island delegates from 9 island regions in Europe together with 50 decision makers.
The Islay conference presented the results of twelve transnational exchanges involving 400 islanders from the island regions of Denmark, Sweden, Finland, France, Scotland and Ireland through the Inter Island Exchange Project financed by the European programme Interreg IIIC.
Amongst the government officials present at the conference, were George Lyon, MSP, Depute Finance Minister, Scottish Executive, Eamon O’Cuiv, the Irish Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs, Giuseppe Bertolucci, Minister for Maritime Affairs of the Tuscany Regional Council, Preben Rudiengaard, Danish MP and Chairman of the Danish Maritime Commission with two colleagues from the Danish Parliament, Aimé Kerguéris, French MP and President of the Maritime Group at the French Parliament, Monica Green, Swedish MP, Neil Mitchison, European Commission representative in Scotland, and Jean-Didier Hache of the CPMR.
Conference Chair, Broadcaster Lesley Riddoch concluded: ”this conference has shown how islands have the imagination and the will to create their own future.”
Islands as transferable development models
The conference showed that the smaller islands of Europe, which are all too often ignored by the mainland and the larger islands, are leading the way with innovative solutions in the field of renewable energy, education, social provisions, and IT.
- Islanders saw their identity as very much bound to their geographical situation, and that in many cases, they would prefer to retain their isolation rather than lose the qualities that make them different. They saw the sea barrier that define islands as the positive factor in developing greater social cohesion, greater independence of spirit and determination to move forward, and in helping to maintain the community values which are under threat in an increasingly urbanized world. It was also acknowledged that islands could not be looked upon solely as museums of culture and language, but as living places, with new people and a tradition that evolves.
- “It is their strong community spirit that binds islanders together and helps them find solutions to their own problems, islands can and must continue to work together, or they will become mere extensions of the mainland.” This was very much insisted upon in the workshop on Island Identity, which stressed the difference between islanders and remote mainlanders, a difference that decision-makers do not always recognise.
- The workshop on islands’ sustainable development concluded that islands were ideally suited for pilot studies, since they can act as “transferable development models,”particularly in the fields of renewable energy, social modelling and the environment.
- Retaining island populations was an important issue as islands tend to attract a high level of second homes. (up to 60% in Scottish islands). Taxes on second homes, or tax incentives to encourage people to live on islands all year round were examples to consider. The provision of housing for renting and of opportunities for remote-working were seen as the way forward. The crofting system was also seen as a good model to help retain island populations. Making the most of island resources, in the context of a reduction in subsidies, and particularly developing local food production, was seen as an important factor.
- The workshop on essential public services and facilities stressed that islanders should and must have the same rights as other citizens, and that their economic contribution had to be understood better, as islanders still had to fight the popular image of islands as financial burden. Yet, islanders paid the same level of taxes as everyone else, without the same level of services, whilst making a considerable contribution to the economy through tourism in particular. It was important to show that “islands are worth it,” and deserve the same level of services as the mainland, especially ion view of that contribution.
- Sweden, where the Annual Road Tax goes to the upkeep of ferries as well as roads was identified as a model of good practice, as Sweden considers the ferry routes to be an extension of the road service.
Small Islands must have better representation
In Scotland, as well as in other island regions, the needs of smaller islands are not always understood nor represented as well as those of larger islands. Apart from Shetland, Orkney and Western Isles, many islands do not have their own regional administrative authorities.
George Lyon, MSP, Depute Finance Minister, Scottish Executive, keynote speaker on the first day of the conference, supported the European Small Islands’ Network vision for a sustainable future, and agreed that “it was vitally important that the needs of islanders are understood,” and that “affordability of transport [was] a key driver in improving the prospects of [Scottish] islands. He said that “islanders need to see a greater direct benefit from the £30million of subsidy per year for ferries and that the air discount scheme is a model which needs to be examined further in the context of ferry fares.” He acknowledged the Scottish Islands Network’s call for a minister with special responsibilities for islands and anticipated that this could be a topic for debate in the forthcoming parliamentary election.
Eamon O’Cuiv, the Irish Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs, made the keynote speech on the second day of the conference. He has direct responsibility for islands and has set up a special “island section” in his department. Mr O’Cuiv said that whilst most government worked in a vertical basis, his government also worked on a horizontal basis, and having a special responsibility for islands was crucial “because [he is] sitting at the table with the other 14 Ministers, [he] can push the issues, and [doesn’t] let them be pushed into the waste-paper basket.” Mr O’Cuiv ‘s view was that “islands are microcosms of what is happening in Rural Europe”, and that providing incentives to islanders to start their own small enterprises and ensure broad range diversification is a key for future sustainability. “Islands should have more money because it costs more to do things in islands.” The Irish government’s policy is to continue to invest in the islands’ infrastructure as a priority until the islands’ transport deficit is addressed.”
It was unanimously agreed that the Irish government provides an example of best practice, which ought to be emulated.
Cllr Gillies, the Scottish Islands Network’s convener, proposed that “a Scottish Island federation on the model of the Danish organisation would be the way forward to represent the smaller Islands in Scotland. A minister for islands in the Scottish Executive is also required to give political support at regional/ National/ EU Government Level, to provide advocacy to small islands, to promote the Interests of all islands, and to help retain close links with EU Funding Streams such as INTERREG 3C.“
Delegates from the Iles du Ponant in France and Elba in Italy agreed that they too could benefit from better representation at government and European level. At present they are obliged to lobby with Mountain groups within their own parliament to get any chance of being heard.
The role of ESIN
ESIN could have an important lobbying role at government and European level to help decision makers better understand island issues, and small islands issues in particular. A new category of disadvantage describing the small island situation would facilitate government departments and agencies in providing the funds needed to address the infrastructural deficits and lack of service provision experienced by small islands.
Cllr Gillies, the Scottish Islands Network’s convener, offered a vision of the future: “by 2013 every island is represented at national level by its own government minister, and each island group has its own properly funded islands federation. Through the European Small Islands Network (ESIN), the Small Islands begin to lobby effectively within the European parliament, and address environmental issues by creating their own environmental fund through tourism.”
Further exchange opportunities with European Funding
The SISU and ISLA projects presented at the conference highlighted how islands can work together using other European funding streams.
Many of the delegates from island regions of Denmark, Sweden, Finland, France, Ireland who worked with Scotland on twelve transnational exchanges through the Inter Island Exchange Project financed by Interreg IIIC, have now come away with inspiration for new exchange projects.
Kees Van Der Vaart, the ISLA project worker from Holland, said: “I have one national and at least two transnational exchanges in the pipeline as a result of attending this conference.” He also suggested that Knowledge Networks should be developed to facilitate the exchange of information accumulated through these European projects.
There was a strong interest to continue with the inter-island exchanges, particularly as the Interreg IV C programme running from 2007 to 2013 offers new funding possibilities. It is particularly important for the future to continue engaging young islanders in a Young People’s network.
The transport issue remains a very important topic: Cllr Gillies concluded that “there has to be a commitment at regional and national level to island ferry and air travel as an extension of our national roads networks. We have examples of good practice with the Danish and Swedish models. What is required is a subtle shift in the way that taxation revenue is re-distributed nationally by government and the EU.”
The role of fishing in island and coastal communities and the protection of their inshore waters was also highlighted by the French and Irish delegates as a crucial issue which would require strong strategic lobbying on the part of ESIN. Tuscany for example was pioneering an integrated “systeme de la Mer” as a pilot project which offers a model of cooperative governance and a better integration of services and development opportunities. The consultation about the Green Paper on European Maritime Policy which was published in June 2006 was seen as an opportunity for a concerted response and for sending a strong message at government and European level. *
In conclusion Bengt Almkvist, the Swedish chairman of the European Small Islands Federation (ESIN), said “ We find ourselves united in defining our common goal: working together with one voice as the Small Islands of Europe to take our case to decision-makers at all levels, regional, national and European. “