A
greener, more sustainable transport policy for the
Scottish islands?
Ferry
Review official Judith Ainsley explains what the current
ferry review will do:
Inform the production of a long
term Ferries Strategy.
|
Feed into next spending review.
|
Influence how ferry services are
procured next time round.
|
Identify an investment plan for
vessels, ports and harbours.
|
Identify policies to be taken
forward to deliver the long term Strategy.
|
Here are some of the working objectives
behind the current ferry review:
Contribute to sustainable
population growth in our islands and remote
rural communities.
|
Contribute to the Government’s
climate change policy to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions.
|
Make the minimum possible impact
on the local and global environment.
|
Support the use of sustainable,
modern, efficient ferry services responsive to
local needs and appropriate to the requirements
of those using them.
|
For full length presentation, click here.
(Powerpoint Presentation)
For
full government document click here
Ferry
review timetable
Work packages deliver
|
Autumn 2009
|
Write draft strategy and
public consultation document
|
Autumn/Winter 2009
|
Public consultation
|
Spring 2010
|
Final Strategy
|
Summer 2010
|
The
view from Napier University’s Transport Research
Institute:
Prof Alf Baird and Gordon Wilmsmeier
from TRI question the real cost-effectiveness of
current subsidy schemes and the promotion and
protection of state-owned ferry companies in
Scotland, compared to the potential for innovation
offered by the private sector throughout the EU.
Can
island economies afford to continue suffering from a
high cost, inefficient, inflexible state-run
transport system that still needs brought into the
20th century never mind the 21st?”
asks Prof Alf Baird.
An
end to state subsidy?
A response is expected in
October/November 2009 from the current EU
Investigation in into support for ferry services in
Scotland. As state Aid rules mean that subsidy
can only be provided when there is a market failure,
this may lead to a reconsideration of the subsidy
currently provided to Caledonian MacBrayne.
CMAL*’s plans for a transnational Interreg IV C
funded investigation in the design of purpose built
small, fast ferries with Ireland and Northern
Ireland hint that Caledonian Macbrayne’s monolithic
attitude to ship design may change at long last.
*
Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd
Ferries: the environmental dimension…
The traditional design of state-owned
ferries in Scotland has been increasingly criticised
as environmentally inferior, as far as pay-load per
litre, energy consumption and emissions are
concerned. These high energy costs and level of
emissions undoubtedly contribute a great deal to the
islands’ carbon footprint, and are not sustainable
in the current peak oil context.
Read about Green Logistics and
shipping, private equity investment
in the European ferry maket in the
proceedings of the conference of the
International Associated of Maritime
Economists in July 1009,
http://www.nsr.nm-uni.eu/news/46/144
|
|
Summary of the article “Ferry
transport in Scotland” by Alf
Baird and Gordon Wilmsmeier
Prof Alf Baird
welcomes new ferry to Orkney
The new catamaran ferry “Pentalina”
which has been built for private
operator Pentland Ferries to serve
the Gill’s Bay to St Margaret’s Hope
route across the Pentland Firth to
Orkney has now arrived in Scotland.
The ferry, manufactured in Cebu in the
Philippines by FBMA Inc., is a 70m long
vessel constructed with a steel hull and
aluminium superstructure. Pentalina is
designed to carry up to 350 passengers,
plus 9 trucks and 32 cars (or over 80
cars). The vessel, with a maximum speed
of 19 knots, will be introduced in
January 2009 across the Pentland Firth,
one of the most notoriously difficult
stretches of water in the world.
All eyes will be on the 100% privately
funded, unsubsidised new ferry, which
will compete with the Caledonian
MacBrayne-owned Northlink Ferries. The
latter receives public funding of around
£30 million a year to run services to
Shetland and Orkney using traditional
monohull ro-ro ferries.
The catamaran has a significantly lower
cost structure than the CalMac/Northlink
ship. Newbuild cost of the
350-passenger/88 car Pentalina
(estimated at about £10m) was one third
the cost of Northlink’s
600-passenger/110 car Hamnavoe (£28m in
2002!). Pentalina has a smaller crew so
there are also cost savings there.
Perhaps most importantly, however, the
Pentalina’s design efficiency and lower
engine power gives a fuel consumption of
about 600 litres/hour compared with the
Hamnavoe’s 1,800 litres/hour, at 16/17
knots.
By virtue of the shorter route between
Gill’s Bay and St. Margaret’s Hope,
Pentland Ferries Pentalina should be
capable of providing up to four
roundtrips/day, compared with
Northlink’s three roundtrips/day on the
Stromness-Scrabster route. Even taking
into account the Pentalina’s lower
capacity relative to Hamnavoe, the
catamaran is expected to eventually
carry more traffic than its fuel-hungry
subsidized competitor.
The article the Ileach published on this
topic a while back seemed to have little
effect and the Minister subsequently
sanctioned the order for a traditional
design of ferry for Islay at a cost of
some £24.5m. The argument still stands,
however, that a superior and also far
less expensive option could have been to
instead order two medium-speed (18 knot)
catamarans for the same price as one
traditional monohull vessel. That option
was never really tested at the time.
Overall vessel capital, crew, and fuel
costs (which make up 90% of the total
running cost of the ship) could have
been significantly reduced.
Whilst new to Scotland, it is not as if
the medium-speed vehicle catamaran is
radically new or un-tested. The
Pentalina’s Queensland based designer
and naval architect Stuart Ballantyne
has designed many similar vessels for
operation in over 40 countries. Mr.
Ballantyne also owns a ferry company in
Australia which has operated similar
vessels successfully for many years.
The new vessel owning company,
Caledonian Maritime Asssets (CMAL), is
now quite rightly taking a significant
interest in the future possibilities for
this and other types of vessel. That
should be reassuring for Scotland’s
island communities who depend on the
most optimal solutions possible, to help
contain and where possible reduce
transport costs, as well as enabling
operators to increase revenues through
service enhancements.
The Pentalina medium-speed catamaran
ferry experience will inevitably be
monitored closely. However the
anticipated success of such a craft
on the Pentland Firth augers well
for many other routes in Scotland,
and elsewhere.
NOTE: this article is reproduced
from ILEACH: The Independent
Newspaper for Islay and Jura, 7th
January 2009
|
Typical fuel consumption
for Isle of Arran type ferry: 450
passenger, 60 cars.
source: CNI report,
CIFALFindhorn, p.40
|
Rear engine
|
1,520
|
Kw
|
Load factor
|
85%
|
|
Fuel consumption of
engine
|
189
|
g/Kwh
|
Fuel consumption
|
290
|
litres/hour
|
Front engine
|
1,140
|
Kw
|
Load factor
|
85%
|
|
Fuel consumption of
engine
|
189
|
g/Kwh
|
Fuel consumption
|
217
|
litres/hour
|
Total fuel consumption
|
507
|
litres/hour
|
The Pentland ferries’ new
catamaran, presented as efficient, cost
effective and environmentally superior in terms
of energy costs and emissions, will now be a
reference in an industry dominated by
traditional design, admittedly “fit for purpose”
but proving to be less than cost effective in
the long run and heavily dependent on state
subsidy.
Have your say
and contribute to the SIF transport policy… We
need your views!
Critical success factors for
ferries are efficient and operational schemes
which allow for frequent, reliable and high
quality services. The potential of private ferry
initiatives is highly underutilised in Scotland,
as they are hampered by public sector inertia,
as well as protection of state-owned ferry
operations. Market distortions are evident and
this prevents more sustainable transport sector
development and at the same time hinders
innovation. Investment incentives for the
private sectors are entirely absent from the
current schemes.
Lengthy bureaucratic practices
prevent the timely introduction of essential
transport innovations and service improvements.
The socio-economic downside of such delays is
highly negative for the remote communities
concerned.
Introduction of new subsidy
schemes such as ADS (Air Discount Scheme) appear
to be implemented without any thoughts being
given to the effect on competing non-subsidised
transport services, with evidence suggesting
significant modal shifts from sea to air
transport as a result of intervention. If
private air transport providers are eligible for
40% state subsidy on ticket prices, then surely
private ferry operators need to be similarly
compensated. (e.g. “Sea Discount Scheme?”)
Private transport operators
demonstrate a willingness to bring forward
innovative, cost-effective transport solutions,
despite heavily subsidised competition from
state-owned operators and other subsidised
modes. Conversely, public sector dependence on
lengthy consultations with stakeholders may
actually result in sub-optimal transport
solutions as well as lengthy delays in
implementation of service improvement plus
dependence on ever-increasing subsidy levels.
Industrial disputes on state
owned ferry services suggest that the state has
actually little control over “lifeline” service
reliability and this also raises the question as
to the need for the state to own and/or operate
ferry services in the first place. Moreover, EU
dictates that all transport services in receipt
of subsidies should be tendered, which is not
yet the case in certain inter-isles ferry
services in Scotland, nor with ADS. Related to
this is the trend throughout the EU for ferry
services, subsidised or otherwise, to be
operated by the private sectors, whereas in
Scotland, the role of the state has been
expanded of late. Ultimately, promotion and
protection of state-owned ferry companies raises
questions regarding the long termed
sustainability of competing private ferry
operators, as well as the real
cost-effectiveness of current subsidy schemes.
Further details can be provided
at: www.orkney-tri-transport-days-and-w.org
Summary of article in “Ferry transport in
Scotland” by Alf Baird and Gordon Wilmsmeier,
Scottish transport Review , issue 37,
2007, p 4 -10.
|