A greener, more sustainable transport policy for the Scottish islands?

Ferry Review official Judith Ainsley explains what the current ferry review will do:

 

 Inform the production of a long term Ferries Strategy.

Feed into next spending review.

Influence how ferry services are procured next time round.

Identify an investment plan for vessels, ports and harbours.

Identify policies to be taken forward to deliver the long term Strategy.

Here are some of the working objectives behind the current ferry review:

Contribute to sustainable population growth in our islands and remote rural communities.

Contribute to the Government’s climate change policy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Make the minimum possible impact on the local and global environment.

Support the use of sustainable, modern, efficient ferry services responsive to local needs and appropriate to the requirements of those using them.

For full length presentation, click here. (Powerpoint Presentation)

For full government document click here 

Ferry review timetable

Work packages deliver

Autumn 2009

Write draft strategy and public consultation document

Autumn/Winter 2009

    Public consultation

Spring 2010

     Final Strategy 

Summer 2010

 

The view from Napier University’s Transport Research Institute:

Prof Alf Baird and Gordon Wilmsmeier from TRI question the real cost-effectiveness of current subsidy schemes and the promotion and protection of state-owned ferry companies in Scotland, compared to the potential for innovation offered by the private sector throughout the EU.

Can island economies afford to continue suffering from a high cost, inefficient, inflexible state-run transport system that still needs brought into the 20th century never mind the 21st?” asks Prof Alf Baird.

An end to state subsidy?

A response is expected in October/November 2009 from the current EU Investigation in into support for ferry services in Scotland.  As state Aid rules mean that subsidy can only be provided when there is a market failure, this may lead to a reconsideration of the subsidy currently provided to Caledonian MacBrayne.  CMAL*’s  plans for a transnational Interreg IV C funded investigation in the design of purpose built small, fast ferries with Ireland and Northern Ireland hint that Caledonian Macbrayne’s monolithic attitude to ship design may change at long last.

* Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd

Ferries: the environmental dimension…

The traditional design of state-owned ferries in Scotland has been increasingly criticised as environmentally inferior, as far as pay-load per litre, energy consumption and emissions are concerned. These high energy costs and level of emissions undoubtedly contribute a great deal to the islands’ carbon footprint, and are not sustainable in the current peak oil context.

 

Read about Green Logistics and shipping, private equity investment in the European ferry maket in the proceedings of the conference of the International Associated of Maritime Economists in July 1009,  http://www.nsr.nm-uni.eu/news/46/144

 

Summary of the article “Ferry transport in Scotland” by Alf Baird and Gordon Wilmsmeier

Prof Alf Baird welcomes new ferry to Orkney

The new catamaran ferry “Pentalina” which has been built for private operator Pentland Ferries to serve the Gill’s Bay to St Margaret’s Hope route across the Pentland Firth to Orkney has now arrived in Scotland. 

 

The ferry, manufactured in Cebu in the Philippines by FBMA Inc., is a 70m long vessel constructed with a steel hull and aluminium superstructure. Pentalina is designed to carry up to 350 passengers, plus 9 trucks and 32 cars (or over 80 cars). The vessel, with a maximum speed of 19 knots, will be introduced in January 2009 across the Pentland Firth, one of the most notoriously difficult stretches of water in the world. 

 

All eyes will be on the 100% privately funded, unsubsidised new ferry, which will compete with the Caledonian MacBrayne-owned Northlink Ferries. The latter receives public funding of around £30 million a year to run services to Shetland and Orkney using traditional monohull ro-ro ferries. 

 

The catamaran has a significantly lower cost structure than the CalMac/Northlink ship. Newbuild cost of the 350-passenger/88 car Pentalina (estimated at about £10m) was one third the cost of Northlink’s 600-passenger/110 car Hamnavoe (£28m in 2002!). Pentalina has a smaller crew so there are also cost savings there. Perhaps most importantly, however, the Pentalina’s design efficiency and lower engine power gives a fuel consumption of about 600 litres/hour compared with the Hamnavoe’s 1,800 litres/hour, at 16/17 knots. 

 

By virtue of the shorter route between Gill’s Bay and St. Margaret’s Hope, Pentland Ferries Pentalina should be capable of providing up to four roundtrips/day, compared with Northlink’s three roundtrips/day on the Stromness-Scrabster route. Even taking into account the Pentalina’s lower capacity relative to Hamnavoe, the catamaran is expected to eventually carry more traffic than its fuel-hungry subsidized competitor. 

 

The article the Ileach published on this topic a while back seemed to have little effect and the Minister subsequently sanctioned the order for a traditional design of ferry for Islay at a cost of some £24.5m. The argument still stands, however, that a superior and also far less expensive option could have been to instead order two medium-speed (18 knot) catamarans for the same price as one traditional monohull vessel. That option was never really tested at the time. Overall vessel capital, crew, and fuel costs (which make up 90% of the total running cost of the ship) could have been significantly reduced. 

 

Whilst new to Scotland, it is not as if the medium-speed vehicle catamaran is radically new or un-tested. The Pentalina’s Queensland based designer and naval architect Stuart Ballantyne has designed many similar vessels for operation in over 40 countries. Mr. Ballantyne also owns a ferry company in Australia which has operated similar vessels successfully for many years. 

 

The new vessel owning company, Caledonian Maritime Asssets (CMAL), is now quite rightly taking a significant interest in the future possibilities for this and other types of vessel. That should be reassuring for Scotland’s island communities who depend on the most optimal solutions possible, to help contain and where possible reduce transport costs, as well as enabling operators to increase revenues through service enhancements. 

 

The Pentalina medium-speed catamaran ferry experience will inevitably be monitored closely. However the anticipated success of such a craft on the Pentland Firth augers well for many other routes in Scotland, and elsewhere.  

NOTE: this article is reproduced from ILEACH: The Independent Newspaper for Islay and Jura, 7th January 2009 

                                          

Typical fuel consumption for Isle of Arran type ferry:   450 passenger, 60 cars.

 source: CNI report, CIFALFindhorn, p.40

Rear engine

 1,520

Kw

Load factor

 85%

 

Fuel consumption of engine

    189

g/Kwh

Fuel consumption

    290

litres/hour

Front engine

 1,140

Kw

Load factor 

85%

 

Fuel consumption of engine

    189

g/Kwh

Fuel consumption

    217

litres/hour

Total fuel consumption

    507

litres/hour

The Pentland ferries’ new catamaran, presented as efficient, cost effective and environmentally superior in terms of energy costs and emissions, will now be a reference in an industry dominated by traditional design, admittedly “fit for purpose” but proving to be less than cost effective in the long run and heavily dependent on state subsidy.

SIF is considering its own response to the ferry review.  SIF transport policy click here (M.S.Word)

Have your say and contribute to the SIF transport policy… We need your views!   

Critical success factors for ferries are efficient and operational schemes which allow for frequent, reliable and high quality services. The potential of private ferry initiatives is highly underutilised in Scotland, as they are hampered by public sector inertia, as well as protection of state-owned ferry operations. Market distortions are evident and this prevents more sustainable transport sector development and at the same time hinders innovation. Investment incentives for the private sectors are entirely absent from the current schemes.

Lengthy bureaucratic practices prevent the timely introduction of essential transport innovations and service improvements. The socio-economic downside of such delays is highly negative for the remote communities concerned.

Introduction of new subsidy schemes such as ADS (Air Discount Scheme) appear to be implemented without any thoughts being given to the effect on competing non-subsidised transport services, with evidence suggesting significant modal shifts from sea to air transport as a result of intervention. If private air transport providers are eligible for 40% state subsidy on ticket prices, then surely private ferry operators need to be similarly compensated. (e.g. “Sea Discount Scheme?”)

Private transport operators demonstrate a willingness to bring forward innovative, cost-effective transport solutions, despite heavily subsidised competition from state-owned operators and other subsidised modes. Conversely, public sector dependence on lengthy consultations with stakeholders may actually result in sub-optimal transport solutions as well as lengthy delays in implementation of service improvement plus dependence  on ever-increasing subsidy levels.

Industrial disputes on state owned ferry services suggest that the state has actually little control over “lifeline” service reliability and this also raises the question as to the need for the state to own and/or operate ferry services in the first place. Moreover, EU dictates that all transport services in receipt of subsidies should be tendered, which is not yet the case in certain inter-isles ferry services in Scotland, nor with ADS. Related to this is the trend throughout the EU for ferry services, subsidised or otherwise, to be operated by the private sectors, whereas in Scotland, the role of the state has been expanded of late. Ultimately, promotion and protection of state-owned ferry companies raises questions regarding the long termed sustainability of competing private ferry operators, as well as the real cost-effectiveness of current subsidy schemes.

Further details can be provided at: www.orkney-tri-transport-days-and-w.org 

Summary of article in “Ferry transport in Scotland” by Alf Baird and Gordon Wilmsmeier, Scottish transport Review , issue 37, 2007, p 4 -10.      

Last modified 08/07/2010